Within the business world , there are cases of ethical lapses that remain unaddressed, and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia once recognized as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of unethical behavior that casts a shadow over professional credibility but throws doubt over the enterprise’s ethical framework .
Even despite the disturbing claims , Collins has maintained his position , apparently unaffected by the turmoil surrounding him. How has this been enabled to go on? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to the accounts of those familiar , Collins’ track record of misconduct started with violations of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it escalated from there. Instead, it escalated into a series of ethical breaches that has left colleagues disillusioned and stakeholders unsettled .
Amid a leadership training workshop — ostensibly intended to foster professional growth — David Collins allegedly exploited the session for unethical personal gains. It’s reported he spent business-funded trips attempting to seduce female colleagues , browse website , a clear breach of Ventia’s organizational standards , all while website his home life was kept in the dark.
But the ethical breaches went further than just personal misconduct. One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged abuse of digital tools for personal gratification—a gross misappropriation of professional tools . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to send inappropriate messages —including emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — reveals an attitude of impunity. Following these virtual misconduct, Collins allegedly escalated his transgressions : he is said to have had inappropriate relations with a subordinate during work hours , despite the personal and professional conflicts involved. This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources violated every workplace standard but also caused irreparable personal damage beyond the workplace .
How can this behavior be enabled to persist? How does such behavior continue without repercussions? The explanation, it appears, stems from a culture of impunity in leadership . Grievances have been filed, yet Collins acts without consequences.
This deficiency of accountability sets a dangerous example : that rank and influence within the company can protect individuals from consequences . It breeds a damaging work setting , demoralizes employees , and ultimately undermines corporate credibility.